ExamsDojo is designed to shorten the feedback loop between practice and improvement. It supports automated scoring and criterion-level feedback for learners, with management workflows for coaching institutes. Programmes include IELTS, PTE and TOEFL, plus Skill Builder and Language Builder.
Last reviewed 14 October 2026
The problem
A practice platform should show what was assessed, what needs work and how the feedback relates to the task, not promise an official test result.
Every coaching centre we spoke to described the same loop. Learners attempt tasks. The attempts queue up. A teacher works through them in the evening. By the time feedback arrives, the learner has moved on and repeated the same mistake four more times.
The fix isn't more teachers — it's removing the wait from the routine part of marking so the teaching hours go where they actually change an outcome.
Problem solving
What gets in the way, and how ExamsDojo handles it.
Learners wait for a teacher to mark every attempt, so feedback arrives long after the practice.
Automated first-pass scoring against criteria implemented in the product returns criterion-level feedback as soon as an attempt ends.
Teachers and coaches spend hours on first-pass marking of repetitive work.
Management tools for institutes route the cases that need a person to a person. Scores are practice estimates, not official results.
A single score does not tell a learner where marks were gained or lost.
Dashboards and performance insights show how each criterion moves across attempts, so practice time goes where it helps.
What's inside
Feature lists are easy to write. These are the ones learners and teachers actually open the product for.
Speaking, writing, reading and listening attempts scored against the criteria implemented in the product for each exam, including content, fluency, pronunciation, grammar and coherence, with a breakdown rather than a single number. Scores are ExamsDojo practice estimates.
Every attempt plotted over time, per skill and per task type. Learners see the trend line; teachers see the whole batch at once and can spot the plateau before it becomes a result.
The platform surfaces where a learner is actually losing marks — not “speaking is weak” but “fluency is fine, pronunciation of consonant clusters is not”. That is a lesson plan, not a score.
A curated bank of exam-aligned lessons, tasks and mock tests, so an institute can start a class without building every question. The bank is maintained as exam formats change.
Short sectional tests isolate one skill when that is what the learner needs, and predictive-style sets concentrate on task types that commonly appear, so late-stage practice is spent where it counts.
Teachers manage cohorts, assign tests, track completion and compare batches. Learners belong to an institute without losing their own private progress view.
Book a demo
Book a short demo and we will walk through it with you.
How it works
One loop, repeated until the score moves. Everything in the product exists to make that loop shorter.
The learner picks a task type — read aloud, describe image, summarise written text, an essay — and attempts it under exam timing. Audio is captured in the browser; no install, no lab.
Speech is transcribed and assessed for content, fluency and pronunciation; written responses for task achievement, coherence, vocabulary and grammar. Each criterion returns its own sub-score.
The learner sees where marks were lost against the descriptor, with the transcript marked up. A score alone tells you that you failed; this tells you what to change.
The attempt joins the learner's trend line and the institute's batch view. Repeated weakness in one criterion is flagged so a teacher can intervene deliberately.
Sectional and predictive tests focus the next round on the gap the data just exposed, rather than another undifferentiated full mock.
Programmes
Each exam marks differently. A single generic model graded against a single generic rubric would be worse than useless, so each format has its own scoring path. Skill Builder and Language Builder cover the practice underneath them. PTE, IELTS and TOEFL are names of third-party exams, used only to identify the formats ExamsDojo is designed to support; ExamsDojo is an independent product and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Pearson, the organizations behind IELTS, or ETS.
Fully computer-scored in the real exam, which makes it the closest fit for automated practice. Integrated tasks that score across two skills at once are handled as the exam handles them.
Band descriptors rather than raw marks. Writing is assessed on task achievement, coherence and cohesion, lexical resource and grammatical range — reported the way an examiner would report them.
Integrated tasks that combine reading, listening and speaking in one response. Scoring accounts for how well source material is used, not only how fluently the learner speaks.
Practice that isolates one skill at a time. When a learner’s results show that speaking fluency, essay structure or listening accuracy is the drag, Skill Builder narrows the work to exactly that, and scores every attempt the same way as the exam tracks.
The language underneath the exams: vocabulary, grammar and sentence-level accuracy built up before and alongside exam practice, so a task is never the first time a learner meets the structure it needs.
Who it's for
For learners
Most candidates are preparing against a guess. They know roughly how they feel about speaking and have no idea whether that translates to the band they need. ExamsDojo replaces the guess with a number they can watch move.
For institutes
A coaching centre's constraint is teacher hours. Every hour spent marking a routine speaking attempt is an hour not spent with the learner who is genuinely stuck. Automating the routine marking doesn't replace teaching — it returns the time to it.
Book a demo
An automated score that nobody trusts is worse than no score at all. ExamsDojo explains what is scored, which criteria are modeled and where automated assessment may differ from an official examiner, and it does not publish an accuracy percentage.
Technology
Nothing exotic. Boring, well-understood technology is what lets a small team run a product with real users and sleep at night.
Questions
Asked most often by coaching centre owners and by candidates deciding where to practise. Support and privacy: info@examsdojo.com, and the privacy policy at examsdojo.com.
No. An ExamsDojo score is a practice estimate based on the criteria implemented in the product. It is not an official result and is not claimed to be equivalent to one. Where confidence is low, the attempt is flagged rather than given a falsely precise number. How learner data is stored and shared is set out in the privacy policy at examsdojo.com.
Both, and they share the same scoring engine. An individual signs up and practises against their own target. Institutes get cohort management, assignments and batch reporting to the extent they are live in the current product; request a demo to see what is available today. IELTS, PTE and TOEFL formats are supported, with Skill Builder and Language Builder, and the exact task types are shown in the product.
More of one, not less. The platform handles the routine marking that was eating evenings and surfaces who needs help with what. Teachers spend their hours on strategy, on the learners who have plateaued and on the parts of language teaching a model cannot do.
No. ExamsDojo is an independent practice product. It is not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by Pearson, the organizations behind IELTS, or ETS. The exam names are used only to identify the formats it supports.
Branded or integrated deployments can be discussed case by case. Tell us what you need and we will say what is possible. Book a demo
ExamsDojo shows how Aviox approaches AI products: evaluation first, explainable outputs and cost engineered per action. If you have a domain where expert judgement is the bottleneck, we can assess whether the same pattern applies. See how we build products
No. Scores are practice estimates produced against the criteria implemented in the product. They are not official PTE, IELTS or TOEFL results.
Yes. ExamsDojo has a separate path for institutes, with tools to follow student progress. Book a demo to see how it works for your coaching centre.
Speaking, writing, reading and listening practice is covered, along with Skill Builder and Language Builder for targeted work.
Start a conversation
Pick the exam and your role, learner or institute, and we will walk you through scoring, feedback and progress tracking.
