Client and matter intake
Capture and classify new enquiries and documents into the right matter and queue.
Right matterRight queueIndustry 07 · Legal & Professional Services
Reduce the time legal teams spend collecting, sorting and locating information. Aviox builds intake, review and knowledge workflows that return source-linked evidence, respect matter permissions and keep legal judgment with authorized professionals.
- Source-linked
- Outputs link back to the documents they relied on
- Matter permissions
- Retrieval follows who may see each matter
- Not legal advice
- Judgment stays with qualified professionals
Where AI helps
Where can AI safely assist a legal team?
Client intake, document classification, chronology preparation, clause identification, knowledge retrieval and matter administration are stronger starting points than attempting to automate legal judgment.
Legal teams lose time collecting, sorting and locating information before any legal thinking can begin. Aviox builds intake, review and knowledge workflows that return source-linked evidence and respect matter permissions.
Legal judgment stays with authorized professionals. The software supports the team by organizing information and surfacing sources; it does not provide legal advice.
What we measure
- Time to find the sourceHow long it takes to reach the relevant passage or precedent, on a defined sample of requests.
- Reviewer agreementHow closely first-pass grouping or clause identification matches qualified reviewers on difficult cases.
- Permission integrityWhether every result respects who is permitted to see each matter.
How we automate it
Legal workflows we can engineer.
Support workflows that surface the right material and leave conclusions to lawyers, plus the privilege and provenance rules that govern them.
Disclosure and document-review support
Group, summarize and prioritize documents for review, with links back to the source.
Source-linkedFor the reviewerContract-analysis support
Identify clauses and compare them against an agreed playbook for a lawyer to assess.
Playbook-basedA lawyer assessesPermission-aware knowledge retrieval
Find internal precedent and guidance while respecting who may see each matter.
Permission-awareFollows matter accessPrivilege and provenance
Know who may see material, where information came from and which action a user actually approved.
Provenance keptSource and approver| Process | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Client and matter intake | Enquiries sorted by hand | Classified intakeEnquiries and documents captured into the right matter |
| Disclosure and document-review support | Documents opened in arbitrary order | Prioritized reviewDocuments grouped, summarized and linked to source |
| Contract-analysis support | Clauses searched for manually | Clauses identifiedClauses compared with the agreed playbook |
| Permission-aware knowledge retrieval | Precedent found by asking around | Cited retrievalPrecedent and guidance found within matter permissions |
| Privilege and provenance | Origins lost in the process | TraceableSource, access and approval recorded for each action |
Products for Legal
Workflow patterns we build.
Three patterns for legal teams, each configured to your matters, playbooks and permissions.
Workflow pattern
Client and matter intake
Intake · Matters · ClassificationCapture and classify new enquiries and documents into the right matter and queue. Configured to your data, rules and systems, with review steps agreed up front.
- New enquiries classified into the right matter
- Documents attached with their source
- Conflicts and checks stay with the team
Workflow pattern
Disclosure and document-review support
Review · Summaries · SourcesGroup, summarize and prioritize documents for review, with links back to the source. Configured to your data, rules and systems, with review steps agreed up front.
- Summaries link back to the source passage
- Prioritization a reviewer can override
- Difficult cases tested with qualified reviewers
Workflow pattern
Contract-analysis support
Knowledge · Permissions · CitationsIdentify clauses and compare them against an agreed playbook for a lawyer to assess. Configured to your data, rules and systems, with review steps agreed up front.
- Retrieval limited to what a user may see
- Answers cite the documents they used
- Starts with a narrow corpus
Note These are starting patterns we configure to your data, rules and systems they are not off-the-shelf SaaS See the products Aviox runs itself
Request a quote
Want this workflow in your organisation?
Share the workflow and we will propose a first pilot.
Request a quote
Where legal work starts.
These are the legal workflows we are usually asked about, listed as a starting point rather than a promise of payback.
- 01Client and matter intake
- 02Document classification
- 03Chronology preparation
- 04Clause identification against a playbook
- 05Permission-aware knowledge retrieval
- 06Matter administration
Compliance
Privilege and confidentiality are design requirements
Aviox does not certify your organization and does not provide legal advice. We engineer matter-level access control, provenance and approval records from the first sprint, and begin with a narrow corpus whose confidentiality boundaries are defined up front.
- Matter permissions
- Source citations
- Access logging
- Retention limits
- Human approval
Connected
Everything this page plugs into.
Every industry page links to one relevant service, one relevant technology page and genuine proof where it exists: the service that does the work, the stack it runs on and where to read further.
The services doing the work
Service
Generative AI engineering
Grounded GenAI, retrieval, agents and document intelligence with evaluation, governance and human review.
Explore ServiceDocument intelligence
OCR, document classification, structured extraction, validation and human review.
Explore ServicesAI, automation, data and software engineering
Services scoped around the system you need to run, not a list of technologies you need to buy.
ExploreThe stack it runs on
Technology
AI and machine-learning stack
Retrieval, citations and evaluation for legal knowledge workflows.
Explore TechnologyData platform stack
Governed storage and access for matter documents.
ExploreRead further
Case studies
Legal sector snapshots
A law-firm website snapshot built to earn trust and make the first consultation easy to book.
Explore All sectorsThe other nine industries
The same engineering pattern, adapted to each sector's rules, evidence needs and human-approval points.
Back to industries Request a quoteScope a legal intake or review pilot
A sentence about the workflow that slows you down is enough to start. An engineer replies, not a sales sequence.
Request a quoteQuestions
Before you get started.
Asked most often by law firms and in-house legal teams.
-
No. The systems support legal teams by organizing information and surfacing sources. Legal judgment and advice stay with qualified professionals.
-
Yes. Outputs can be built to link back to the specific documents or passages they relied on, so a reviewer can verify them.
-
Yes. Retrieval can be restricted to the material a user is already permitted to see, so confidentiality boundaries and matter permissions carry through to the answers.
-
Yes. A playbook can define the clauses and positions to check against. Difficult cases are tested with qualified reviewers before the workflow is relied on.
-
No. It helps with intake, document review and knowledge retrieval, with sources shown, while legal judgment stays with qualified professionals.
-
Access follows the permissions you already have, so people see only the matters and documents they are allowed to see.
-
Yes. Retrieval is built so an answer points back to the source document, which makes review faster and mistakes easier to catch.
Start a conversation
Start with one
narrow corpus.
Tell us the matter type, the documents and who may see them. We will propose a first workflow and the review standard it must meet.